Showing posts with label dry campus. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dry campus. Show all posts

Thursday, November 19, 2015

Dry Campus Vs. Wet Campuses

    Students drinking on college campuses has been a cultural normality for generations. In order to combat this, many campuses have a “dry campus” policy that doesn’t even allow students that are of legal age to drink to have alcohol on campus. But do these policies really stop college students from doing it? The answer is no and because of this, most colleges have removed the ban for those of legal drinking age, but that still doesn’t get rid of the problem that no matter what, underage students are going to drink. Younger students have older friends that supply alcoholic beverages to them. This enables binge drinking within the underage community. Many parents have problems with their children going to colleges with “wet” campuses due to worries of drunk driving, fighting, sexual assault, and alcohol poisoning.
Most of these concerns are valid, proven by the statistics taken by Wechsler, Henry, and Toben F. Nelson in the study, “What We Have Learned From the Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Study: Focusing Attention on College Student Alcohol Consumption and the Environmental Conditions That Promote It.” saying that with each alcoholic drink consumed, the chances of injury increase drastically (Wechsler and Nelson 2006). Universities that are promoting a dry campus have the intentions of reducing these injuries and removing the problems that involve alcohol consumption. While wet campuses feel that they should allow students to do as they please if they are of legal age because, well, they are adults. Making that decision is something that comes along with the responsibilities of being an adult.
But, what if we could come up with a compromise that allows both sides of the argument to be satisfied? We are proposing that campuses provide “wet zones” among college campuses for ages 18 & up. You can review our proposal here.

Wednesday, November 18, 2015

I didn’t think it was possible to enjoy college without alcohol until I went to grad school on a dry campus. Are undergrads learning that the only way to have fun is when we're drunk?

Source: Tkaick, Christina. "I Didn’t Think It Was Possible to Enjoy College without Alcohol until I Went to Grad School on a Dry Campus." Washington Post. The Washington Post, 22 May 2015. Web. 18 Nov. 2015.

Summary: Originally going to school at University of Virginia, Christina was used to seeing and living the party life. When she finished though, she realized she had a serious alcohol problem. After getting cleaned up she moved to Beirut to begin her masters at the American University of Beirut. What she didn’t realize at the time was that this University has a dry campus. She says she was happily surprised “...that there’s also plenty of people here who don’t drink much, or at all.” (Tkacik). After getting herself sober she says that she was once out with friends and “ suddenly realized, it was the first time since high school I’d had this much fun without being drunk or high. I didn’t even remember it was possible.”

Being a social person she attends school events and says she braced herself "for chaos, pushing, shoving, the general tomfoolery I’ve always associated with outdoor university events. Instead, I saw people eating and having fun, listening attentively to comedy routines and live music — all, apparently, without the influence of alcohol. There were no drunken frat guys whooping. Not one coed could be seen vomiting in the bushes, her mascara smeared down to her chin. No one was defacing school property, or using the recycling bin as a urinal. What was happening?" (Tkacik). This was a scene she had not seen before at previous events she had attended.

Quality: This article was written by someone who was a former binge drinker that has cleaned themselves up and is now sober. In her article she states her opinion on how nice a dry campus is. She is a social person and attends events around and outside of the school therefore seeing the difference between events she was used to attending and the sober events on her new campus.

Issues: This article puts most of its weight on a dry campus she lived on in another country that may be very different from a dry campus in the US. Christina even states "A few restaurants in my West Beirut neighborhood don’t even serve alcohol — some of them no doubt out of respect to their Muslim clientele, who are generally less likely to drink. " (Tkacik) showing a big cultural difference in the two areas she has been. One where there is probably at least one bar in the area and most restaurants sell alcohol on a regular basis and the other where part of the clientele doesn't normally drink. Also she only had the experience of living on one campus that did allow drinking. Who's to say that other "wet" campuses are the same. Some may not be as bad as the University of VA was or it may have just been that particular class of students at the University.

Keywords:

Drinking

Dry Campus

Graduate Student

Binge-Drinking

Drinking on Campus: University of Kentucky Relaxes Its Alcohol Policy

Source: Sanburn, John. "The University of Kentucky Will Allow Drinking on Campus Again." Time. Time, 25 Apr. 2014. Web. 18 Nov. 2015.

Summary: This article is about how the University of Kentucky is revoking their dry policy after off campus riots. This article shows how the university discovered why the dry policy wasn’t getting rid of the alcohol problem, and instead moving the problem off campus, which has disturbed the off-campus community.“The thought was that you could monitor this, that it was a more controlled environment, so allowing more drinking on campus may be a way for universities to regain some of that control." (Usdan) says co author of the survey Stuart Usdan.

Quality: This article references a study published in the American Journal of Health Studies showing that the data they gathered was accepted by professionals in this field. It is also a newer article and study referring back to only last year. Furthermore it references the University of Kentucky's local paper, The Lexington Herald Leader, which has a further in depth coverage of the matter.

Issues: This article seems a bit vague in the reasons why the University of Kentucky lifted its ban, making it seem that the riots were the only reason. Unfortunately, this article was written just when the university decided to lift the ban so there isn't a way of knowing whether or not this decision has proven to be effective at fixing the alcohol problem.

Key Words:
Dry policy
off-campus drinking
harm-reduction policy
on-campus bar
controlled environment

Tuesday, November 17, 2015

Should colleges be allowed to ban alcohol on campus?

Source: Gross, Jessica, and Mike Dang. "Should Colleges Be Allowed to Ban Alcohol on Their Campuses?" Unigo. N.p., 4 Mar. 2015. Web. 10 Nov. 2015.


Summary: This article is a two sided argument about whether or not colleges should be able to ban alcohol on their campuses and also addresses important reasons why some campuses go dry.


The first half of the article, which is pro-allowing bans, compares college to a business and states that students can easily go somewhere else if these rules aren’t to their liking. The author also points out why some non-religious schools have a dry policy, such as campuses that just want to appeal to those who just don’t like to be around alcohol. Author Jessica Gross states, “Just as students should be able to pick a school with no alcohol ban, they should be able to pick a school with a dry campus. To say that no school ever should institute a ban on alcohol is to reduce the spectrum of applicants’ options to a segment of the market.” (Gross).


The second half however,compares the dry policy to the prohibition and believes that college students are going to drink anyway, so colleges should find other methods of keeping students safe. The author of this part of the article, Mike Dang, states,”College students drink—they just do….So rather than try to enforce a ban that clearly failed in our country 80 years ago on campus, colleges should be proactive in other ways to keep students safe…” (Dang). Furthermore, the author addresses the benefits of having a “wet zone,” on campus, such as how the profits from selling alcohol on campus could go to fund other programs, and how having alcohol on campus can create a strong campus community, at least from his perspective.


Quality: This article addresses both sides of the ban debate and gives supportive reasoning behind both of the points. This article is also a newer source of information that is coming straight from students instead of an outside party or study.


Issues: Author Mike Dang is a little unprofessional in some of his statements. For example, he states,” Luckily, our government learned that banning alcohol was stupid…”(Dang). The use of the word, “stupid,” feels childish, leaving room for readers to discredit his opinion.


Key words:
Dry policy
on-campus bar
Prohibition
underage drinking